Work, Isolation, and the Breakdown of Solidarity

In our final session of the fall Reading Group, Psychopathology of Work, we sat with a disturbing but necessary question, what does it mean when the workplace becomes the scene through which suffering is communicated? That question shaped our discussion of Christophe Dejours’ chapter on political stakes of work-related suffering, alongside Jean-Philippe Deranty’s reading of Dejours’ broader psychodynamics of work.

One of the clearest signals from the discussion was the significance of the location for workplace suicides. In Dejours’ account, the fact that the act occurs at, or in relation to, the workplace is not incidental. It suggests that work has become more than a site of employment; it has become the scene where humiliation, submission, and abandonment are organized and experienced. Rather than treating suicide as a purely individual act or work as a purely external stressor, these texts pushed us toward a harder question, what kind of social world has a workplace become when death at work begins to function as a message?

The big idea in these readings is not simply that work can be stressful. It is that contemporary workplaces can produce a specific kind of suffering: affective solitude in the middle of the crowd. Workplace suicide, in this framework, is not only a personal tragedy. It is also a social symptom.

Question of the week: What kinds of belonging at work are actually protective - and which ones only make isolation look more social?

Read More

Welcome Jonathan Williams!

We are pleased to welcome Jonathan Williams as our new Doctoral Research Associate! Jonathan joined us in January 2026 and has already made the role his own - pitching in on strategy development, developing marketing and communications plans, and contributing to our Reading Group and our Writing Group.

CPOS Fall/Winter Study Group begins September 18

In this set of readings we will explore Christophe Dejours’ Psychopathology of Work. Each month, we will read and discuss chapters in the book along with relevant articles, reflecting on how unconscious processes, organizational structures, and subjective experience shape work and mental health. Our goal is to develop a shared conceptual and clinical framework for understanding the psychopathology of work and strategies for organizational practice.

Anyone who is interested in psychosocial perspectives on organizations, work, and society is welcome to participate. We meet every third Thursday at 11am CT.

To learn more contact Mindy Duncan, surfacingtheorg@gmail.com.

Sara Elias becomes Editor-in Chief

Sara Elias, PhD, a founding member of the Center for Psychosocial Organization Studies, recently became an Editor-in-Chief at the Scandinavian Journal of Management. According the journal's website its aim is to "provide an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management." The journal strives to "promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness." Dr. Elias has been a Research Associate at the Center for Psychosocial Organization Studies since 2019.

Accreditation as a social defense

Healthcare management struggles to be both a scholarly discipline and a legitimate practice. Legitimacy is often equated with being “business like”. As such, healthcare management scholars and practitioners have made “professionalization” a priority in an effort to legitimize the field (Gerard, 2019; 2021). Accreditation is at the center of this effort.

Accreditation of healthcare management programs (along with clinics, behavioral health programs, and hospitals) makes sense on the surface, but it is also a way that faculty and students (and clinicians, managers, and executives), unconsciously, protect themselves from having to confront the field’s complicity with questionable managerial techniques that at best reinforce existing health (and healthcare) inequities and, at worst, exacerbate social injustices.

Working in healthcare settings, as managers and as clinicians, requires awareness of self and other experiences in the face of acute fear, anxiety, loss of hope, and even death – while holding hope for recovery, health, and life. Yet, in today’s healthcare environments, managers and clinical staff avoid these emotional complexities with technical models, data-driven interventions, and pretentions to rigorous science. The psychoanalytic question here: what do these efforts represent unconsciously, and what do they attempt to cover over or deny?

Read more…